Gilltrans.net

An Intelligent Transportation and Connected Vehicle Research Blog

Browsing Posts published by Joe Gillis

An obvious question you may be asking is, “Why hasn’t something been done already?” Actually, this intersection has been identified as a problem since the early 2000′s.  My intent was to perform a traffic study without being prejudiced by prior details on what has already been attempted.  I have virtually completed the data gathering phase, so I feel free to reveal the backstory.
 

Until late 2006, this intersection was located in unincorporated Fulton County, Georgia.  In December 2006, the City of Milton, Georgia was incorporated.  One of the outcomes of this change was to shift the 20% share responsibility from the county to the new city.
 

Another development in late 2007 was a change in commissioners at the Georgia DOT to Gena Evans.  This change was initiated by Governor Sonny Perdue.  I wish to avoid making this blog political, so I will give a high-level opinion on what occurred at this point.
 

Over the years, GDOT had placed a huge number of road projects on the to do list.  This may have been done to help local politicians – that happens everywhere, all the time, right?  There was also some issues placing projects in rural areas of the state and neglecting metro Atlanta.  Road funding is divided equally by US Congressional districts.  As you can imagine, metro Atlanta has more needs per capita that rural areas so you can see where there would be a great need for GDOT to try to say ‘yes’ to metro projects.  The new commissioner was brought in to make the department solvent.  therefore some projects were cut and others were delayed.  Projects continue to be delayed.
 

Back to this project.  With two strikes against this intersection receiving the funding, it is understandable that nothing has been done.
 

I did some investigation and found out the following:
 

GDOT hired a consultant to redesign the intersection.  The project description on the books reads:  “This project is an intersection improvement on SR 372 at Providence/New Providence Road. The current intersection is non-signalized and the lack of turning lanes and increased traffic volumes contribute to congestion along the corridor. The project consists of realigning the intersection, improving the sign distance along SR 372. It will also signalize the intersection with dedicated turning for each leg. Further improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, and pedestrian crossings.”
 

I realize that it is GDOT’s standard to put curb, gutter and sidewalk everywhere but this is somewhere you probably don’t want to encourage pedestrians.  However, if this project ever occurs, it will be built this way.  I would like to suggest that another ‘must include’ is a conduit lay along Birmingham Highway – in case Milton ever has a TMC and wants to remotely control traffic signals or install and monitor traffic cameras at intersections.
 

This is some information from the 2009 budget plan for the City of Milton.  [The project is programmed for 2013.  It had previously been programmed for earlier construction - the earliest I found was 2008.]
 

2009 Milton Budget includes $240K for completing the concept plan and starting the environmental and final design.  I do not know if this has been completed at this time.
 

Appendix D of the 2009 Budget noted that this intersection was ranked #1 in public demand.  I can certainly understand why!
Appendix E   of the accompanying Milton Transportation Plan noted that this intersection had 10+ injuries in the time period: 2006-2008.  there was a fender-bender the day I did my traffic count.
 

The entire project is programmed to  $3,500,00 (Milton’s portion $706,000) not including the purchase of property ROW.  I did some research of the Fulton County Tax Assessor site and determined that three lots that would need to be purchased were assessed at a little under $1,000,000 last year:
 

* 22 396008470201 NW Corner of intersection Value $263,000
* 22 396008470102 NE Corner of Intersection Value $254,100
* 22 396008470144 Parcel east of …102     Value $450,500 –> Total $967,600
 

According to the GDOT project description, ROW aquisition cost is $1,648,000 (Milton’s portion: $329,600)
None of these lots were owned by GDOT as of 2009.
 

The resulting project totals:
v
* GDOT $4,142,400 (Project 0005448)
* Milton $1,035,600
 

So, Milton will have to find $1,000,000 in this poor economy to get this intersection fixed.  Possibly a more difficult task, GDOT will have to allocate $4,000,000.
 

I have some opinions beyond this, but that is better saved for a future post.

To continue my previous post…I would like to compare the high speed rail situation to the freeways and ITS.  Over-crowded highways have a cost in terms of delay, safety and other consequences.  It can hinder a region’s economic growth if not adequately addressed.  I fear the airline industry is headed this same way if nothing is done.  I realize that high-speed rail may never be profitable without help – see Exhibit A (AMTRAK).  However, if it can be shown that rail can help the airways be less crowded and therefore safer then maybe there’s a way to sell the cost to the taxpayer.  I would suggest that the airlines be given an incentive to enter the rail business – to replace the losses they would occur form having fewer short-distance routes.  I am sure there are a lot more angles and nuances and maybe some rebuttal that I would love to read and consider for my own education, so feel free to comment.

There have been a few stories in the AJC recently about how Georgia only got enough high-speed rail money to buy one of the McMansions in nearby Milton, GA ($750,000).  Whereas Florida and North Carolina together garnered around $2 Billion.  Some may accuse this as being a red-state/blue-state thing, but that would be too easy and is probably not true in this case.  It is more likely the case of  ‘To whom much is given, much is expected.’  And from Georgia, apparently, little is expected.

First of all, I am not sure that high-speed rail can with without a federal subsidy.  Look at Amtrak, or low-speed or heavy rail if you prefer.  I want to take on this issue from another angle, one that pertains to ITS.  When you have a congested road you can either build a new one, widen the existing one(s), encourage fewer people to use it, or use ITS to make it more efficient.  This is usually funded by public funding because it serves the common good of the community or region.  Although there are some toll roads and/or toll lanes, those are in the minority for now.

The airspace in many areas (like that over NC, FLA and GA and elsewhere) is getting congested with flights to small communities like Chattanooga, Birmingham, Macon, Greenville SC, etc…  There certainly is some room to replace these little hops with a high-speed train ride.  Once you consider the time to go to/from the gate and terminal, taxi and takeoff, there becomes a point where a train ride becomes feasible.

Will have more to say in my continued response later in Pt. 2.

I have now processed the number and the mean and Median Speeds were 50 MPH.  The posted speed limit is 45 MPH and there is an advisory speed of 35 MPH.  The 85th Percentile speed is 60 MPH, which is 15 MPH over the posted speed.  Whenever the 85th percentile speed is more than 5 MPH over the posted speed one or more of the following measures are recommended:

·  Adjust the posted speed limit.
·  Increase speeding enforcement.
·  Initiate traffic calming measures.
·  Conduct public awareness efforts.

·  Adjust the posted speed limit.

·  Increase speeding enforcement.

·  Initiate traffic calming measures.

·  Conduct public awareness efforts.

Option 1 is not going to happen so one or more of the other three might need to be considered.

On Thursday, Jan. 28th I performed a spot speed study of traffic approaching the intersection from the south – the direction of concern.  As shown in a prior photo, the prevailing speed is 45 MPH.  however there is an advisory sign 500 feet to the south of the intersection indicating an intersection <+> and 35 MPH.

I marked off 264 feet from the stop bar as indicated by the 4th photo in the prior post and stood on an embankment to the west of Birmingham Highway.  I used a stopwatch and timed traffic from my position to each vehicle’s passing of the photo location.

My general observation is that traffic approaching that did not turn was usually 10-20 MPH over the speed limit.  Only when vehicles were turning left or right were approach speeds more temperate.

I counted 103 cars, 4 buses and 7 trucks over a 45 minute period.  Some were in platoons of 2 to as many as 4 vehicles.  Frequently vehicles were traveling in the 55 to 60 MPH range, which meant that they took 3 to 4 seconds to crest the hill and arrive at the intersection.

I will tabulate all the results and include them in a future post.

IMG_5071

This photo shows the flasher control at the intersection.  Birmingham Hwy has a yellow flash and providence has a red flash.  if this ever became a 4-way stop the signal change required would be minimal.

NOTE: This post was written a few months ago and mistakenly left as a draft…

I heard on the radio coming in this AM that ASCE has released an Infrastructure Report Card for the country and the results were not good. See HERE.

There is no easy solution. There are plenty of vendors and consultants with plenty of skills and brains to do what is needed and then some. The issue is that there is not enough money to do them. When money is scarce it forces governments to prioritize their projects – that is very critical at this time. Projects that are critical must move to the front of the line. Also, projects with a high cost-benefit ratio should move to the top. ITS projects fit that requirement and should be noted as such.

There are a few options to raise money – none are very popular. Probably the least popular is raising the gas tax. Even though prices are in a depression, we all know that $4.00/gal gas will return eventually. Changing from a gas tax to an annual mileage tax has been discussed but is very unpopular and subject to fraud. Critics from the green community cite that the curent tax helps them in their push for more efficient cars and therefore fewer emissions. This leaves private/public partnerships for toll roads/lanes and/or toll HOV or Truck Only Tolling (TOT). These are somewhat pay-to-play tax schemes that allow a choice for non-commercial vehicles. The choice is pay ot sit in traffic longer. In the case of TOT, the haulers will just force price increases that consumers/drivers will pay anyway. The alternative for haulers is to increase the use of rail transport. Again, there is no simple solution but some combination of much of the above is probably going to happen.

-JKG

I have some images that show the possible sight distance issues at this intersection:

IMG_5067
What an eastbound driver looking south on Birmingham sees.

IMG_5068
What a southbound driver on Birmingham sees while seeking to make a left turn onto providence.

IMG_5069
What a westbound driver looking south on Birmingham sees while waiting to go straight on new Providence or turn right on .

IMG_5072
What a westbound driver looking south on Birmingham sees while waiting to make a left turn onto Birmingham.

The 2nd and 4th photos are the most concerning. The time distance from the driver position top of the ridge in the road is only 3-4 seconds as verified by a spot speed study I performed January 28th. Notice the weeds along the east side of Birmingham Hwy in the last photo. Keeping these weeds trimmed is very important – especially in summer. They can hinder the sight distance in a negative way.

Providence Rd and Birmingham Hwy (SR 372)

Providence Rd and Birmingham Hwy (SR 372)


This intersection is located in what is a major commuter route in the city of Milton and has a sight distance issue that I felt needed investigating.
providencebirmingham study area

Although I have some opportunities in the works, I am still seeking a full-time position in the ITS industry. Something I am doing in the interim is learning and/or mastering some skills that I have been exposed to, am interested in and compliment my project management experience in the traffic industry.

The following is a summary of my pursuits:

1) Performing traffic studies – spot speed, sight distance, stop sign/signal warrants, school zone studies
2) Learning Bentley GEOPAK in conjunction with becoming reacquainted with Microstation.
3) Practicing on traffic simulation software – SYNCHRO and CORSIM
4) Reviewing traffic signal timing techniques

Each of these things are roles I would be interested in doing in the future as part of a traffic engineering role with a company or organization. They are also things I see mentioned in relevant job descriptions I have read during my career change.

 The traffic and transportation world is definitely feeling the recession.  While public funding is drying up there is the hope that stimulus funding will help bridge the gap until tax receipts are strong again and able to support widespread funding for my profession.  I have had co-workers and other colleagues affected by this downturn and some have found work others haven’t.  What remains to be seen is how the demand for improved transportation will track as compared to the available funding given current methods for creating funding sources.  In a normal industry, demand drops in a recession as buyers pull back and save money, pay off debt or do something else with their money.  Transportation needs never take a holiday, they only increase and with funding being less available this demand is likely to increase and at some point turn exponential as needs stack on top of needs.  I certainly expect that we will soon be to the point where there will be further crumbling or roads and bridges and the cost to just keep up what we already have will sap almost all that is available to spend on transportation.  How does this portend for ITS?  We have to be creative and clever.  If there are a lot of road projects going on there’s opportunity for two things – work zone management and placement of fiber cable in the ground.  There’s also the need to have adjusted traffic signal control plans during construction.  Of course we in ITS can still use cost/benefit analysis data to justify new ITS devices where needs occur, but there is certainly more competition for every dollar available.  I see the need for more coming together to solve problems.  I have worked on a regional ATMS project in metro Atlanta where three suburbs came together and this is going well thus far.  Arterial Management is going to be the next big thing as freeway management approaches build-out in many places. Hopefully things will turn around son as we ride out this storm.